Nov 27, 2020

Clinical engineering is reshaping digital healthcare

Clinical engineering
LTTS
healthcare
Digital
William Girling
2 min
As digital technology continues to permeate healthcare, we explore how clinical engineering could hold the key to its optimisation
As digital technology continues to permeate healthcare, we explore how clinical engineering could hold the key to its optimisation...

As healthcare becomes more technologically advanced, opportunities to address some of hospitals’ most fundamental and enduring challenges have presented themselves, namely:

  • Skill gaps and shortages
  • Training
  • High staff turnover

‘Clinical engineering’ (CE) may yet prove to be the key for overcoming these obstacles. A speciality in Health Technology Management, it focuses on developing optimised solutions for healthcare delivery using the latest available devices. 

Cambridge University Hospitals defines the overall purpose of CE as managing an organisation’s thousands of various medical devices so that “the benefits of this technology are maximised and the risks minimised.”

The process of doing so could involve pre-purchase evaluations, maintenance, development and more. Moreover, CE is also concerned with the training and education required for achieving this goal.

As found in a study conducted by the World Health Organisation (WHO), CE is a multifaceted discipline with a complex and interconnected relationship ecosystem, including everything from hospital admin, regulation agencies, insurance companies and more.

It also encompasses a wide range of aspects: health technology management, safety, practical applications, R&D, IT, education and training, etc.

Managing a complex environment

CE’s capacity to manage the operations of highly complex and vital healthcare environments is demonstrated by electronic intensive care units (eICUs), also referred to as tele-ICUs. These are able to:

  • Provide care to patients in multiple facilities simultaneously
  • Enable 24/7 care
  • Optimise clinical expertise

A study by Philips established that the implementation of an eICU programme could increase bed management control by 44% and improve operating margins by 665% (the equivalent of $52.7m).

In ‘ICU Telemedicine Program Financial Outcomes’, Dr Craig Lilly, Director of the eICU Program at UMass Memorial Medical Center, found that, “The ability of tele-ICU programs to increase case volume and access to high-quality critical care while improving margins suggests a strong financial argument for wider adoption of ICU telemedicine by health systems and intensivists.”

Therefore, the operational, humanitarian and business case for enhancing critical healthcare operations with digital technology is readily apparent. Exploring its further applications could ultimately lead to a watershed moment in modern clinical engineering. 

Areas with significant potential for improvement in a hospital/provider environment include:

  • Enhanced asset management: IoT (internet of things) and cloud networks could coordinate an indoor positioning system for healthcare assets, enabling greater organisation and equipment deployment. This also includes better oversight of inventories and equipment and stock maintenance.
  • Remote problem solving: Furthermore, an integrated network within a hospital will allow for easier equipment monitoring and facilitate solving multiple problems simultaneously and remotely.  
  • Enhanced forecasting: Data analytics can be leveraged to predict demand for consumables, spare parts, replacement parts, and more, thus optimising inventory.

 Find out more in LTTS' white paper: download here

Share article

Jun 21, 2021

How health plans can reduce healthcare inequalities

healthcareinequalities
COVID19
healthplan
sdoh
4 min
Jim Clement from Inovalon on the role of health plans in improving access to healthcare

The COVID-19 pandemic has put inequalities accessing the healthcare system in the spotlight. Jim Clement, Vice President of Product & Services at cloud provider Inovalon, tells us that health plans play the most integral role in advancing the health equity movement.

Why did it a global pandemic to highlight the issue of healthcare inequities? 

Health inequity in the US has been well understood by healthcare professionals for many years, but it has become more evident due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It wasn’t until the racial and ethnic differential seen in response to COVID-19 related infections, deaths and vaccinations that many Americans became acutely aware of the health inequity due to sociodemographic factors such as race, geography, education and income.

Fortunately, there’s now a growing health equity movement afoot in America which aims to improve public health and achieve equity in health status for all people by ensuring opportunities are available to attain the highest level of health. While the entire healthcare ecosystem is important to this transformation, it is health plans that arguably play the most integral role.

How can health plans help? 

Achieving health equity means obstacles to health must be removed, including poverty, discrimination, powerlessness, and lack of access to the basics like physicians, hospitals, medicine, technology, and health education. This is not only a social justice initiative, but also a clear call to action for health plan organisations that are bearing the economic brunt of the costs due to health disparities. 

Health plan organisations that recognise the alignment between efforts to improve health equity and broader member engagement initiatives will be in the best position to move the needle. Plans must also understand that the provision of medical services within hospital walls, physician offices and other health services providers is necessary, but not sufficient. 

By recognising that health inequity also includes non-medical factors such as employment, income, housing, transportation, childcare, and more, plans will be better equipped to ensure their members are set up for success. 

What do healthcare providers need to do generally to address inequities? 

Outreach by both health plans and providers is critical to ensuring people have knowledge of available services, the reason those services are critical to their health, and options to access those services based on their unique circumstances. With both stakeholders beating the same drum, progress can be made quickly.

Given the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH), should healthcare providers take a more active role in addressing these, or other agencies? 

While communicating with patients is critically important, what is truly required to address inequalities is helping patients take medical  actions – like regular PCP visits, monitoring A1C and accepting health coaching – that are necessary to maximise their health, along with non-medical actions –like availing themselves of community resources that address homelessness, food insecurity and employment services. 

The most progressive providers and payers have or are putting in place programs to address these non-medical issues.  In addition, non-medical tools such as transportation services can certainly help drive the effectiveness of medical services. 

How important is it to educate patients about their health and how can this be done? 

Education is a social determinant of health and a key lever to be used to drive health equity.  Patients who do not understand their medical conditions or the consequences of non-compliance with their treatment plans are prone to poor outcomes. 

For health plans, understanding member needs is one of the biggest drivers of quality care. A continuous cycle of engagement through feedback and appropriate responses will provide health plans with an opportunity to uncover, discuss, and resolve problems faster. 

Improving member outreach and engagement can be made easier with a programmatic approach involving four stages of intentional outreach: Getting to know your members, educating members, seeking feedback from members and gaining member loyalty. Each stage not only contributes to a better member experience but also to improved outcomes and higher satisfaction scores.

Now that the issue has come to the fore, what do you think things will look like in 5 years or so?

I predict that health plans that get member engagement, education and equity right will achieve better health and greater value, faster. Those who get it wrong or delay will suffer the consequences of competitive disadvantage and pay a larger share of the rising costs associated with health inequity.

Share article