May 17, 2020

Pharmaceutical companies continue to express concerns surrounding Brexit

pharmaceutical
EU
Brexit
Catherine Sturman
2 min
Gilead opens lab in Carrigtwohill manufacturing plant costing $11mn
Since the UK voted to leave the European Union, the pharmaceutical industry has worked strenuously to tackle the long-term challenges this might represe...

Since the UK voted to leave the European Union, the pharmaceutical industry has worked strenuously to tackle the long-term challenges this might represent. With limited knowledge surrounding whether the UK would be heading for hard Brexit until recently, the industry has been working somewhat in the dark in the building of contingency plans, costing thousands in revenue.

The EU and UK have recently agreed on the first preliminary stages, yet the second stage of talks will then incorporate the pharmaceutical industry and how the 27 remaining EU states will collaborate with the UK in the development, importation and exportation of essential medical treatments.

The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) has stated: “As we now focus on phase two of the negotiations, it is now crucial that the regulation and supply of medicines for UK and EU patients is prioritised. A co-operation agreement between the UK and the EU on medicines is the best way to ensure that there is no disruption to 500mn patients receiving the medicines that they need.”

At present, 45 million packs of medicines leave Britain each month, with 37 million being imported.

Related stories

“Currently, with the uncertainty of the negotiations as we have them, we’re leaving patients scratching their heads, hoping that somebody has a plan in place,” Virginia Acha, a member of EFPIA’s Taskforce on Brexit, informed the European Parliament’s environment and health committee, Bloomberg has previously reported. 

“We’ve already had since Article 50 a full three quarters of the year where we’ve been waiting to have the discussions and we really can’t wait longer,” she continued.

The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee has also recently published evidence in a new enquiry surrounding the impact Brexit may have on the industry. With input from the Association of British Healthcare Industries, the British Generic Manufacturers Association, and many more, it highlights rising concerns surrounding escalating drug prices and any new potential barriers to the development of new drugs. It could have the potential to hinder any investment into new research and significantly affect drug supply chains.

Additionally, the European Medicines Agency is set to relocate from London to Amsterdam, to the dismay of the UK government, costing over €400mn.

Nonetheless, pharmaceutical companies will need significant time to prepare, with a transition deal being essential to mitigate any potential risk to patients.

Share article

May 6, 2021

Women leading in healthcare means better patient outcomes

womeninhealthcare
Leadership
medicaldevices
hearthealth
Julie Tyler
5 min
Women leading in healthcare means better patient outcomes
Julie Tyler, Divisional Vice President at Abbott’s Vascular Business, tells us why women leading in healthcare means better patient outcomes...

I know I’m pointing out the obvious, but women are different to men. In the context of healthcare—a woman’s physiology, symptoms and sometimes even treatment options are different from a man's. We have witnessed this in cardiovascular health, where there is ample research and evidence that women’s symptoms are often different to men’s. We also know that heart disease is responsible for 1 in 3 deaths in women annually—it is the number one killer.

The fact is women do not always get the treatment they need. A lot of that has to do with who is treating them, how they are being treated by their physicians and the healthcare systems that are designed to support patient needs. 

The proof is in the research at the care level; a 2017 study of hospitalised patients over the age of 65, examined differences in outcomes based on the gender of the treating physician. The results of the study concluded that patients treated by female physicians had lower mortality and readmission rates compared with those cared for by male physicians. 

Gender equity starts at the top

I believe that gender equity in healthcare starts at the top with the leaders who set expectations around workplace culture, and that trickles down to the workforce. 

You might think gender has nothing to do with how patients are treated—a patient is a patient, regardless of age, ethnicity, religion, creed, color or gender. But I believe there is a correlation between female leadership in healthcare and better patient outcomes—for men and women. Despite a predominantly female workforce in healthcare (65% of healthcare workers are women), only 13% of healthcare CEOs are women.

The disparity in the number of women in the healthcare C-suite is irrefutable, but I believe the more diversity we have at the boardroom table in hospitals and health systems— and that includes women—the more perspectives we bring to the decisions that ultimately impact patients and their families.

Female healthcare leaders are also caregivers

Many women are still the primary caregivers at home. The responsibility of grocery shopping and meal planning, making doctor and dentist appointments for children and elderly parents, and everything in between still tends to fall to women.  

This lived experience gives women the ability to think about innovations and solutions from the perspective of the caregiver—not just the patient. The fact is when someone is sick in the family, it affects the whole family.

As a woman, I often think about solutions and technologies that facilitate holistic healing and health that support the whole family. Bringing the mentality of inclusion to healthcare leadership means programs like the American Heart Association’s Go Red for Women campaign, will ensure research and treatment for cardiovascular disease in women will get the attention it deserves and ultimately, better outcomes for patients.

The bottom line and meaningful work are equally important

A 2019 study found that public companies with a female CEO were more profitable than their competitors with men at the helm, but that didn’t come at the cost of job fulfillment.

Women who lead companies and organisations can influence their workforce by rallying around a common cause. Having meaningful work and the opportunity to make a difference in the world is powerful motivation that doesn’t have to come at the cost of profitability. 

The work we do at Abbott is a good example—I consistently reinforce the good that comes from the research and development of the products we make with my team. Clinical trials, like the current LIFE-BTK trial, is consciously recruiting female principal investigators who work with underserved populations to enroll patients from communities of color and women. Knowing the work we do has a social impact on society might be difficult to quantify, but in my opinion, it’s priceless and could lead to meaningful treatment options that improve patient outcomes in the long-term.

Emotional intelligence and empathy are not soft skills

Interpersonal skills, problem-solving and self-awareness are considered “soft skills”—skills that might not be required to do the job, but in leadership positions, they are no longer “nice to haves,” they are “need to haves” if you are going to inspire high-performing teams. 

Research suggests women tend to score higher on social and emotional competencies than men. In the words of Joanne Conroy, the CEO and President of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health in New Hampshire, “Diverse representation at the table changes the conversation. It becomes more collaborative; there is more listening and less interrupting. We have better conversations about how we are functioning as a team and we create a safe space when people can be honest with their feedback to all members of the team, including the leader.” 

I’m not suggesting women have a monopoly on soft skills, however having gender diversity around the boardroom table means a diversity of skills. Being aware of your team’s morale and what motivates them is equally important as managing your supply chain.

When it comes to health, we know that patients want more personalised care. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to generate data that is tailored to the health needs of women and ultimately lead to better treatment options and outcomes. But the data insights generated by AI are only as good as the patients’ data available for analysis. To maximize the potential of AI—and meet the expectation of personalised care for patients—healthcare leaders need to be aware of who is and isn’t being included in studies and clinical trials, like women, and telegraph the need for greater inclusion to their teams. 

These ideas are just the tip of the iceberg. Sure, we have come a long way since Elizabeth Blackwell—the first female physician in the United States—founded New York Presbyterian Hospital. Sure, there is still plenty of work to do, but I do hope my contribution is paving the way for more women to take on leadership roles in healthcare and make a positive impact on lives of all patients and their families.

Share article