The US witnesses significant number of healthcare breaches in 2017
Up to two billion files containing the personal data of US citizens were leaked in 2017. An eyewatering 551 breaches affected organisations with over 1.9 billion files leaked, according to research Citrix ShareFile collected from the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse and the 2017 Cost of Data Breach Study by the Ponemon Institute, in partnership with IBM Security.
The most common type of breach in 2017 was hacking, causing 819 million files to be released, with unintended disclosure and physical loss found to be the second and third most common. These shocking figures do not include the many companies that have either not disclosed the number of files affected or did not have access to that information.
The most targeted and vulnerable industry was healthcare, which recorded 328 leaks (nearly 60% of all leaks in 2017) at an estimated cost of almost US$1.2 billion and put the personal information of both patients and health care companies in jeopardy.
Citrix ShareFile spoke to experts who explained that healthcare was targeted due to personal data such as social security numbers and payment information being more high value information for cyber criminals.
Suffering the largest breach in the healthcare industry was the Commonwealth Health Organization, where 697,800 records were reported compromised. Of the 328 leaks, 46% came through hacking or malware, 33% were a result of unintended disclosure, 18% came from physical loss and a combined 4% came from insider leaks and portable devices.
- San Francisco Bay are set to develop a new hospital as a result of a $500mn donation
- Health employment is set to rise by 11.5mn by 2026, report finds
- Could MetroHealth’s ‘hospital in a park’ pave the way for a greener future?
How were other sectors affected?
While healthcare recorded the most breaches, many other industries were also greatly affected by cybercrime, including the following top three:
- Technology: 48 breaches amounting to 1,752,323,557 files at an estimated cost of $1,187,360,000.
- Retail: 40 breaches representing 4,721,736 records at an estimated cost of $144,800.000
- Finance: 40 breaches and 146,020,981 records at an estimated cost of $144,800,000.
Experts that Citrix ShareFile worked with commented that 2017 had an unprecedented and far more severe impact than previous years. Charlie Porter, an agent at Farmers Insurance, explained that the last year has been “the worst in history for large-scale data breaches,” adding that the “effects of the incidents could take years or decades to deal with.”
Although the cybersecurity industry is now one of the top in the world, the public’s personal data is still at risk. Pieter VanIperen from Code Defenders commented on the tough challenge facing companies in 2017 and beyond, explaining that “a hacker has to be right once; a cybersecurity team has to be right every single time.”
Summarising the state of cybersecurity, Paul Moreno, a cybersecurity expert and Bugcrowd advisor, said, “this will forever be a game of Spy vs. Spy,” as for every vulnerability or attack vector closed, another one opens.
Allyson Kuegel, customer security assurance analyst at Citrix, said of the findings, “these figures show that despite organisations and individuals being more vigilant, businesses are facing more challenges than ever before as individuals exploit any possible vulnerability they can.
“In the technological era, people are more willing than ever to supply data, whether it is on personal social media accounts or through transactions they make. It is not just online where companies face potential problems, but also in ensuring their own organisations invest in the latest software and have effective internal protocols.
“The battle against cybercrime and data breaches will continue for a long time as hackers look to keep one step ahead of the latest security services.”
How UiPath robots are helping with the NHS backlog
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused many hospitals to have logistical nightmares, as backlogs of surgeries built up as a result of cancellations. The BMJ has estimated it will take the UK's National Health Service (NHS) a year and a half to recover.
However software robots can help, by automating computer-based processes such as replenishing inventory, managing patient bookings, and digitising patient files. Mark O’Connor, Public Sector Director for Ireland at UiPath, tells us how they deployed robots at Mater Hospital in Dublin, saving clinicians valuable time.
When Did Mater Hospital implement the software robots - was it specifically to address the challenges of the pandemic?
The need for automation at Mater Hospital pre-existed the pandemic but it was the onset of COVID-19 that got the team to turn to the technology and start introducing software robots into the workflow of doctors and nurses.
The pandemic placed an increased administrative strain on the Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) department at Mater Hospital in Dublin. To combat the problem and ensure that nurses could spend more time with their patients and less time on admin, the IPC deployed its first software robots in March 2020.
The IPC at Mater plans to continue using robots to manage data around drug resistant microbes such as MRSA once the COVID-19 crisis subsides.
What tasks do they perform?
In the IPC at Mater Hospital, software robots have taken the task of reporting COVID-19 test results. Pre-automation, the process created during the 2003 SARS outbreak required a clinician to log into the laboratory system, extract a disease code and then manually enter the results into a data platform. This was hugely time consuming, taking up to three hours of a nurse’s day.
UiPath software robots are now responsible for this task. They process the data in a fraction of the time, distributing patient results in minutes and consequently freeing up to 18 hours of each IPC nurse’s time each week, and up to 936 hours over the course of a year. As a result, the healthcare professionals can spend more time caring for their patients and less time on repetitive tasks and admin work.
Is there any possibility of error with software robots, compared to humans?
By nature, humans are prone to make mistakes, especially when working under pressure, under strict deadlines and while handling a large volume of data while performing repetitive tasks.
Once taught the process, software robots, on the other hand, will follow the same steps every time without the risk of the inevitable human error. Simply speaking, robots can perform data-intensive tasks more quickly and accurately than humans can.
Which members of staff benefit the most, and what can they do with the time saved?
In the case of Mater Hospital, the IPC unit has adopted a robot for every nurse approach. This means that every nurse in the department has access to a robot to help reduce the burden of their admin work. Rather than spending time entering test results, they can focus on the work that requires their human ingenuity, empathy and skill – taking care of their patients.
In other sectors, the story is no different. Every job will have some repetitive nature to it. Whether that be a finance department processing thousands of invoices a day or simply having to send one daily email. If a task is repetitive and data-intensive, the chances are that a software robot can help. Just like with the nurses in the IPC, these employees can then focus on handling exceptions and on work that requires decision making or creativity - the work that people enjoy doing.
How can software robots most benefit healthcare providers both during a pandemic and beyond?
When the COVID-19 outbreak hit, software robots were deployed to lessen the administrative strain healthcare professionals were facing and give them more time to care for an increased number of patients. With hospitals around the world at capacity, every moment with a patient counted.
Now, the NHS and other healthcare providers face a huge backlog of routine surgeries and procedures following cancellations during the pandemic. In the UK alone, 5 million people are waiting for treatment and it’s estimated that this could cause 6,400 excess deaths by the end of next year if the problem isn’t rectified.
Many healthcare organisations have now acquired the skills needed to deploy automation, therefore it will be easier for them to build more robots to respond to the backlog going forwards. Software robots that had been processing registrations at COVID test sites, for example, could now be taught how to schedule procedures, process patient details or even manage procurement and recruitment to help streamline the processes associated with the backlog. The possibilities are vast.
The technology, however, should not be considered a short-term, tactical and reactive solution that can be deployed in times of crisis. Automation has the power to solve systematic problems that healthcare providers face year-round. Hospital managers should consider the wider challenge of dealing with endless repetitive work that saps the energy of professionals and turns attention away from patient care and discuss how investing in a long-term automation project could help alleviate these issues.
How widely adopted is this technology in healthcare at the moment?
Automation was being used in healthcare around the world before the pandemic, but the COVID-19 outbreak has certainly accelerated the trend.
Automation’s reach is wide. From the NHS Shared Business Service in the UK to the Cleveland Clinic in the US and healthcare organisations in the likes of Norway, India and Canada, we see a huge range of healthcare providers deploying automation technology.
Many healthcare providers, however, are still in the early stages of their journeys or are just discovering automation’s potential because of the pandemic. I expect to see the deployment of software robots in healthcare grow over the coming years as its benefits continue to be realised globally.
How do you see this technology evolving in the future?
If one thing is certain, it’s that the technology will continue to evolve and grow over time – and I believe there will come a point in time when all processes that can be automated, will be automated. This is known as the fully automated enterprise.
By joining all automation projects into one enterprise-wide effort, the healthcare industry can tap into the full benefits of the technology. This will involve software robots becoming increasingly intelligent in order to reach and improve more processes. Integrating the capabilities of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning into automation, for example, will allow providers to reach non-rule-based processes too.
We are already seeing steps towards this being taken by NHS Shared Business Service, for example. The organisation, which provides non-clinical services to around two-thirds of all NHS provider trusts and every clinical commissioning organisation in the UK, is working to create an entire eco-system of robots. It believes that no automation should be looked at in isolation, but rather the technology should stretch across departments and functions. As such, inefficiencies in the care pathway can be significantly reduced, saving healthcare providers a substantial amount of time and money.